Smart Contract Audits & Web3 Security

Timeline depends on codebase size and complexity. Most audits run between one and four weeks. We scope each engagement before work begins so timelines are agreed on upfront.

Our primary stacks are Rust on Solana and Solidity on Ethereum and EVM-compatible networks. We also audit Move, Go, Vyper, Yul, C++, Clarity, and FunC across Sui, Cosmos, Polkadot, and other ecosystems.

A preaudit surfaces known vulnerability patterns and structural issues before the formal audit begins. It reduces noise in the final report and lets the audit focus on edge cases and logic-level findings. A full audit is a comprehensive manual review led by senior engineers covering your entire in-scope codebase.

Yes. Fix review is included in every engagement. Once the team has remediated findings, we verify that each vulnerability is fully resolved and that the fix didn't introduce new issues. The engagement closes when the code is clean, not when the report is delivered. For protocols that want ongoing coverage, we also offer continuous security review and PR monitoring post-launch.

Audit pricing depends on codebase size, complexity, and timeline. Most engagements range from a few thousand dollars for smaller scopes to six figures for large, multi-contract systems or chains requiring specialized expertise. We scope every engagement before work begins so pricing is agreed upfront with no surprises.

A full audit from Adevar Labs includes a threat model, manual line-by-line code review of every in-scope contract, custom fuzzing against value-handling functions, an infrastructure review, and a detailed report with severity classifications and remediation guidance. Fix verification is included — we confirm vulnerabilities are closed before the protocol ships.

Automated scanners match code against known vulnerability signatures. They're fast and useful as a first-pass triage tool. They don't understand protocol logic, can't detect economic attacks or logic bugs, and have no model of what your code is supposed to do. A manual audit is adversarial research conducted by engineers who understand your system's intent, not just its syntax. The Cetus Protocol lost $223M in May 2025 to an integer overflow that pattern-matching tools would have missed.

The most valuable preparation is documentation. A clear architecture overview, natspec comments on complex functions, and a list of known assumptions or edge cases you're uncertain about reduces time spent on orientation and lets the audit focus on adversarial review. Frozen code at the start of the engagement is also essential — auditing a moving target increases the risk of scope gaps.